AMD Ryzen 9 9950X Review vs AMD 7950X, 9700X, intel 14900K, & More
We've tested and compared AMD Ryzen 9950X processor against the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X, AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D, R7 9700X, intel 14900K, intel 14700K. It is best for workstation application.
We've tested and compared AMD Ryzen 9950X processor against the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X, AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D, R7 9700X, intel 14900K, intel 14700K. It is best for workstation application.
6 mins
Oct 20, 2024
The AMD Ryzen 9 9950X is up for review, and we’re diving into its performance against contenders like the Ryzen 9 7950X, R7 9700X, and Intel's 14900K. What sets the 9950X apart is its architecture, built on Zen 5, and its unique requirement for core parking, a system that optimizes CPU core usage for certain tasks.
Pricing and Alternatives
AMD Ryzen 9 9950X: 68k to 79k
Buy from Amazon - https://amzn.to/3XiElWu
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X: ₹53k to ₹77k
Buy from Amazon - https://amzn.to/3ziZCHK
AMD Threadripper 7960X: Upto ₹149k
Buy from Amazon - https://amzn.to/3XoWcez
Intel Core i9-14900K: 54k to 68k
Buy from Amazon - https://amzn.to/3XnyHT1
AMD Ryzen 9 7900X: up to 37k to 62k
Buy from Amazon - https://amzn.to/4cZB701
Core Parking Setup
Before getting into the benchmarks, it's crucial to understand how core parking works for the 9950X. This feature is now necessary for the 9950X and the upcoming 9900X. Core parking is designed to manage how cores are allocated across workloads, especially when the CPU has multiple chiplets (CCD). Without this setup, performance can be affected by double-digit percentages.
New CPU's like the 9950X and 9900X require core parking for optimal performance. Here’s a quick setup guide:
Install AMD Chipset Drivers: Ensure you have the latest chipset drivers.
Update Windows: Enable Game Mode and update the Game Bar.
Configure Power Settings: Use the Balanced power plan(Control Panel > Power Options) or After rebooting, run start /wait Rundll32.exe advapi32.dll,ProcessIdleTasks in Command Prompt to finalize settings.
Verify Configuration: Use powercfg.exe /queryprofile scheme_current profile_gamemode CPMinCores to ensure core parking is active.
Skipping this process could significantly hamper performance in both gaming and productivity tasks.
Frequency Performance
All-Core Frequency: The 9950X reached an average of 5000MHz under full load, slightly underperforming the 7950X’s 5100MHz. However, the 9950X outpaces the 9700X (4500MHz) in most tests.
Single-Core Frequency: In Cinebench single-threaded tests, the 9950X hit around 5710-5725MHz, marginally behind the 7950X (5750MHz).
Power Consumption
In heavy workloads like Blender, the 9950X consumed 223W, significantly lower than the 7950X (251W) but well above the 9700X (87.6W). This places it in a better power-efficiency bracket than the Intel 14900K, though it remains more power-hungry than the previous Ryzen generations.
Benchmark Results
Blender (Tile-Based Rendering)
The 9950X outperformed the 7950X by 12%, showing impressive gains, particularly for production workloads like 3D rendering. The 9950X also shaved off 43% of the render time compared to the older 5950X, making it a top choice for content creators.
Adobe Photoshop
The 9950X showed only a minor 7% improvement over the 7950X, with the 9700X and 9950X performing similarly. Adobe Photoshop doesn’t fully leverage the extra cores, so the performance uplift in this area was modest.
Adobe Premiere
In Premiere, the 9950X delivered a 31% performance boost over the 5950X, aligning itself closely with Intel’s 14900K in this area. The improvement from the 3950X was 42%, marking a significant generational leap.
Chromium Code Compile
The 9950X reduced compile time by 10% compared to the 7950X, completing the task in 66 minutes. This result firmly places the 9950X ahead of its predecessors and competitors in highly parallelized tasks.
7-Zip Compression and Decompression
The 9950X posted strong results in compression, delivering a 5.9% increase over the 7950X. However, its biggest win came in decompression, where it outpaced the 14900K by 22%, showing that workloads favoring multi-core setups greatly benefit from this chip.
Efficiency
While the 9950X excels in all-core workloads, its efficiency in less demanding tasks, like gaming, was underwhelming. In games like Final Fantasy XIV, the 9950X pulled 85W, which led to lower efficiency when compared to CPUs with fewer cores. Games simply don’t leverage the full potential of a 16-core CPU, making it less ideal for gamers prioritizing efficiency.
Conclusion
The AMD Ryzen 9 9950X is an impressive upgrade, particularly for professionals in content creation, 3D rendering, or software compilation. It shows strong generational improvements in power efficiency and multi-core performance. However, the core-parking requirement is something to be mindful of, as incorrect setup could lead to performance dips. For gamers, its high power draw and limited efficiency gains may push them toward other options, but for workstation use, the 9950X is a powerful, well-rounded choice.
The AMD Ryzen 9 9950X is up for review, and we’re diving into its performance against contenders like the Ryzen 9 7950X, R7 9700X, and Intel's 14900K. What sets the 9950X apart is its architecture, built on Zen 5, and its unique requirement for core parking, a system that optimizes CPU core usage for certain tasks.
Pricing and Alternatives
AMD Ryzen 9 9950X: 68k to 79k
Buy from Amazon - https://amzn.to/3XiElWu
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X: ₹53k to ₹77k
Buy from Amazon - https://amzn.to/3ziZCHK
AMD Threadripper 7960X: Upto ₹149k
Buy from Amazon - https://amzn.to/3XoWcez
Intel Core i9-14900K: 54k to 68k
Buy from Amazon - https://amzn.to/3XnyHT1
AMD Ryzen 9 7900X: up to 37k to 62k
Buy from Amazon - https://amzn.to/4cZB701
Core Parking Setup
Before getting into the benchmarks, it's crucial to understand how core parking works for the 9950X. This feature is now necessary for the 9950X and the upcoming 9900X. Core parking is designed to manage how cores are allocated across workloads, especially when the CPU has multiple chiplets (CCD). Without this setup, performance can be affected by double-digit percentages.
New CPU's like the 9950X and 9900X require core parking for optimal performance. Here’s a quick setup guide:
Install AMD Chipset Drivers: Ensure you have the latest chipset drivers.
Update Windows: Enable Game Mode and update the Game Bar.
Configure Power Settings: Use the Balanced power plan(Control Panel > Power Options) or After rebooting, run start /wait Rundll32.exe advapi32.dll,ProcessIdleTasks in Command Prompt to finalize settings.
Verify Configuration: Use powercfg.exe /queryprofile scheme_current profile_gamemode CPMinCores to ensure core parking is active.
Skipping this process could significantly hamper performance in both gaming and productivity tasks.
Frequency Performance
All-Core Frequency: The 9950X reached an average of 5000MHz under full load, slightly underperforming the 7950X’s 5100MHz. However, the 9950X outpaces the 9700X (4500MHz) in most tests.
Single-Core Frequency: In Cinebench single-threaded tests, the 9950X hit around 5710-5725MHz, marginally behind the 7950X (5750MHz).
Power Consumption
In heavy workloads like Blender, the 9950X consumed 223W, significantly lower than the 7950X (251W) but well above the 9700X (87.6W). This places it in a better power-efficiency bracket than the Intel 14900K, though it remains more power-hungry than the previous Ryzen generations.
Benchmark Results
Blender (Tile-Based Rendering)
The 9950X outperformed the 7950X by 12%, showing impressive gains, particularly for production workloads like 3D rendering. The 9950X also shaved off 43% of the render time compared to the older 5950X, making it a top choice for content creators.
Adobe Photoshop
The 9950X showed only a minor 7% improvement over the 7950X, with the 9700X and 9950X performing similarly. Adobe Photoshop doesn’t fully leverage the extra cores, so the performance uplift in this area was modest.
Adobe Premiere
In Premiere, the 9950X delivered a 31% performance boost over the 5950X, aligning itself closely with Intel’s 14900K in this area. The improvement from the 3950X was 42%, marking a significant generational leap.
Chromium Code Compile
The 9950X reduced compile time by 10% compared to the 7950X, completing the task in 66 minutes. This result firmly places the 9950X ahead of its predecessors and competitors in highly parallelized tasks.
7-Zip Compression and Decompression
The 9950X posted strong results in compression, delivering a 5.9% increase over the 7950X. However, its biggest win came in decompression, where it outpaced the 14900K by 22%, showing that workloads favoring multi-core setups greatly benefit from this chip.
Efficiency
While the 9950X excels in all-core workloads, its efficiency in less demanding tasks, like gaming, was underwhelming. In games like Final Fantasy XIV, the 9950X pulled 85W, which led to lower efficiency when compared to CPUs with fewer cores. Games simply don’t leverage the full potential of a 16-core CPU, making it less ideal for gamers prioritizing efficiency.
Conclusion
The AMD Ryzen 9 9950X is an impressive upgrade, particularly for professionals in content creation, 3D rendering, or software compilation. It shows strong generational improvements in power efficiency and multi-core performance. However, the core-parking requirement is something to be mindful of, as incorrect setup could lead to performance dips. For gamers, its high power draw and limited efficiency gains may push them toward other options, but for workstation use, the 9950X is a powerful, well-rounded choice.
The AMD Ryzen 9 9950X is up for review, and we’re diving into its performance against contenders like the Ryzen 9 7950X, R7 9700X, and Intel's 14900K. What sets the 9950X apart is its architecture, built on Zen 5, and its unique requirement for core parking, a system that optimizes CPU core usage for certain tasks.
Pricing and Alternatives
AMD Ryzen 9 9950X: 68k to 79k
Buy from Amazon - https://amzn.to/3XiElWu
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X: ₹53k to ₹77k
Buy from Amazon - https://amzn.to/3ziZCHK
AMD Threadripper 7960X: Upto ₹149k
Buy from Amazon - https://amzn.to/3XoWcez
Intel Core i9-14900K: 54k to 68k
Buy from Amazon - https://amzn.to/3XnyHT1
AMD Ryzen 9 7900X: up to 37k to 62k
Buy from Amazon - https://amzn.to/4cZB701
Core Parking Setup
Before getting into the benchmarks, it's crucial to understand how core parking works for the 9950X. This feature is now necessary for the 9950X and the upcoming 9900X. Core parking is designed to manage how cores are allocated across workloads, especially when the CPU has multiple chiplets (CCD). Without this setup, performance can be affected by double-digit percentages.
New CPU's like the 9950X and 9900X require core parking for optimal performance. Here’s a quick setup guide:
Install AMD Chipset Drivers: Ensure you have the latest chipset drivers.
Update Windows: Enable Game Mode and update the Game Bar.
Configure Power Settings: Use the Balanced power plan(Control Panel > Power Options) or After rebooting, run start /wait Rundll32.exe advapi32.dll,ProcessIdleTasks in Command Prompt to finalize settings.
Verify Configuration: Use powercfg.exe /queryprofile scheme_current profile_gamemode CPMinCores to ensure core parking is active.
Skipping this process could significantly hamper performance in both gaming and productivity tasks.
Frequency Performance
All-Core Frequency: The 9950X reached an average of 5000MHz under full load, slightly underperforming the 7950X’s 5100MHz. However, the 9950X outpaces the 9700X (4500MHz) in most tests.
Single-Core Frequency: In Cinebench single-threaded tests, the 9950X hit around 5710-5725MHz, marginally behind the 7950X (5750MHz).
Power Consumption
In heavy workloads like Blender, the 9950X consumed 223W, significantly lower than the 7950X (251W) but well above the 9700X (87.6W). This places it in a better power-efficiency bracket than the Intel 14900K, though it remains more power-hungry than the previous Ryzen generations.
Benchmark Results
Blender (Tile-Based Rendering)
The 9950X outperformed the 7950X by 12%, showing impressive gains, particularly for production workloads like 3D rendering. The 9950X also shaved off 43% of the render time compared to the older 5950X, making it a top choice for content creators.
Adobe Photoshop
The 9950X showed only a minor 7% improvement over the 7950X, with the 9700X and 9950X performing similarly. Adobe Photoshop doesn’t fully leverage the extra cores, so the performance uplift in this area was modest.
Adobe Premiere
In Premiere, the 9950X delivered a 31% performance boost over the 5950X, aligning itself closely with Intel’s 14900K in this area. The improvement from the 3950X was 42%, marking a significant generational leap.
Chromium Code Compile
The 9950X reduced compile time by 10% compared to the 7950X, completing the task in 66 minutes. This result firmly places the 9950X ahead of its predecessors and competitors in highly parallelized tasks.
7-Zip Compression and Decompression
The 9950X posted strong results in compression, delivering a 5.9% increase over the 7950X. However, its biggest win came in decompression, where it outpaced the 14900K by 22%, showing that workloads favoring multi-core setups greatly benefit from this chip.
Efficiency
While the 9950X excels in all-core workloads, its efficiency in less demanding tasks, like gaming, was underwhelming. In games like Final Fantasy XIV, the 9950X pulled 85W, which led to lower efficiency when compared to CPUs with fewer cores. Games simply don’t leverage the full potential of a 16-core CPU, making it less ideal for gamers prioritizing efficiency.
Conclusion
The AMD Ryzen 9 9950X is an impressive upgrade, particularly for professionals in content creation, 3D rendering, or software compilation. It shows strong generational improvements in power efficiency and multi-core performance. However, the core-parking requirement is something to be mindful of, as incorrect setup could lead to performance dips. For gamers, its high power draw and limited efficiency gains may push them toward other options, but for workstation use, the 9950X is a powerful, well-rounded choice.
The AMD Ryzen 9 9950X is up for review, and we’re diving into its performance against contenders like the Ryzen 9 7950X, R7 9700X, and Intel's 14900K. What sets the 9950X apart is its architecture, built on Zen 5, and its unique requirement for core parking, a system that optimizes CPU core usage for certain tasks.
Pricing and Alternatives
AMD Ryzen 9 9950X: 68k to 79k
Buy from Amazon - https://amzn.to/3XiElWu
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X: ₹53k to ₹77k
Buy from Amazon - https://amzn.to/3ziZCHK
AMD Threadripper 7960X: Upto ₹149k
Buy from Amazon - https://amzn.to/3XoWcez
Intel Core i9-14900K: 54k to 68k
Buy from Amazon - https://amzn.to/3XnyHT1
AMD Ryzen 9 7900X: up to 37k to 62k
Buy from Amazon - https://amzn.to/4cZB701
Core Parking Setup
Before getting into the benchmarks, it's crucial to understand how core parking works for the 9950X. This feature is now necessary for the 9950X and the upcoming 9900X. Core parking is designed to manage how cores are allocated across workloads, especially when the CPU has multiple chiplets (CCD). Without this setup, performance can be affected by double-digit percentages.
New CPU's like the 9950X and 9900X require core parking for optimal performance. Here’s a quick setup guide:
Install AMD Chipset Drivers: Ensure you have the latest chipset drivers.
Update Windows: Enable Game Mode and update the Game Bar.
Configure Power Settings: Use the Balanced power plan(Control Panel > Power Options) or After rebooting, run start /wait Rundll32.exe advapi32.dll,ProcessIdleTasks in Command Prompt to finalize settings.
Verify Configuration: Use powercfg.exe /queryprofile scheme_current profile_gamemode CPMinCores to ensure core parking is active.
Skipping this process could significantly hamper performance in both gaming and productivity tasks.
Frequency Performance
All-Core Frequency: The 9950X reached an average of 5000MHz under full load, slightly underperforming the 7950X’s 5100MHz. However, the 9950X outpaces the 9700X (4500MHz) in most tests.
Single-Core Frequency: In Cinebench single-threaded tests, the 9950X hit around 5710-5725MHz, marginally behind the 7950X (5750MHz).
Power Consumption
In heavy workloads like Blender, the 9950X consumed 223W, significantly lower than the 7950X (251W) but well above the 9700X (87.6W). This places it in a better power-efficiency bracket than the Intel 14900K, though it remains more power-hungry than the previous Ryzen generations.
Benchmark Results
Blender (Tile-Based Rendering)
The 9950X outperformed the 7950X by 12%, showing impressive gains, particularly for production workloads like 3D rendering. The 9950X also shaved off 43% of the render time compared to the older 5950X, making it a top choice for content creators.
Adobe Photoshop
The 9950X showed only a minor 7% improvement over the 7950X, with the 9700X and 9950X performing similarly. Adobe Photoshop doesn’t fully leverage the extra cores, so the performance uplift in this area was modest.
Adobe Premiere
In Premiere, the 9950X delivered a 31% performance boost over the 5950X, aligning itself closely with Intel’s 14900K in this area. The improvement from the 3950X was 42%, marking a significant generational leap.
Chromium Code Compile
The 9950X reduced compile time by 10% compared to the 7950X, completing the task in 66 minutes. This result firmly places the 9950X ahead of its predecessors and competitors in highly parallelized tasks.
7-Zip Compression and Decompression
The 9950X posted strong results in compression, delivering a 5.9% increase over the 7950X. However, its biggest win came in decompression, where it outpaced the 14900K by 22%, showing that workloads favoring multi-core setups greatly benefit from this chip.
Efficiency
While the 9950X excels in all-core workloads, its efficiency in less demanding tasks, like gaming, was underwhelming. In games like Final Fantasy XIV, the 9950X pulled 85W, which led to lower efficiency when compared to CPUs with fewer cores. Games simply don’t leverage the full potential of a 16-core CPU, making it less ideal for gamers prioritizing efficiency.
Conclusion
The AMD Ryzen 9 9950X is an impressive upgrade, particularly for professionals in content creation, 3D rendering, or software compilation. It shows strong generational improvements in power efficiency and multi-core performance. However, the core-parking requirement is something to be mindful of, as incorrect setup could lead to performance dips. For gamers, its high power draw and limited efficiency gains may push them toward other options, but for workstation use, the 9950X is a powerful, well-rounded choice.
The AMD Ryzen 9 9950X is up for review, and we’re diving into its performance against contenders like the Ryzen 9 7950X, R7 9700X, and Intel's 14900K. What sets the 9950X apart is its architecture, built on Zen 5, and its unique requirement for core parking, a system that optimizes CPU core usage for certain tasks.
Pricing and Alternatives
AMD Ryzen 9 9950X: 68k to 79k
Buy from Amazon - https://amzn.to/3XiElWu
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X: ₹53k to ₹77k
Buy from Amazon - https://amzn.to/3ziZCHK
AMD Threadripper 7960X: Upto ₹149k
Buy from Amazon - https://amzn.to/3XoWcez
Intel Core i9-14900K: 54k to 68k
Buy from Amazon - https://amzn.to/3XnyHT1
AMD Ryzen 9 7900X: up to 37k to 62k
Buy from Amazon - https://amzn.to/4cZB701
Core Parking Setup
Before getting into the benchmarks, it's crucial to understand how core parking works for the 9950X. This feature is now necessary for the 9950X and the upcoming 9900X. Core parking is designed to manage how cores are allocated across workloads, especially when the CPU has multiple chiplets (CCD). Without this setup, performance can be affected by double-digit percentages.
New CPU's like the 9950X and 9900X require core parking for optimal performance. Here’s a quick setup guide:
Install AMD Chipset Drivers: Ensure you have the latest chipset drivers.
Update Windows: Enable Game Mode and update the Game Bar.
Configure Power Settings: Use the Balanced power plan(Control Panel > Power Options) or After rebooting, run start /wait Rundll32.exe advapi32.dll,ProcessIdleTasks in Command Prompt to finalize settings.
Verify Configuration: Use powercfg.exe /queryprofile scheme_current profile_gamemode CPMinCores to ensure core parking is active.
Skipping this process could significantly hamper performance in both gaming and productivity tasks.
Frequency Performance
All-Core Frequency: The 9950X reached an average of 5000MHz under full load, slightly underperforming the 7950X’s 5100MHz. However, the 9950X outpaces the 9700X (4500MHz) in most tests.
Single-Core Frequency: In Cinebench single-threaded tests, the 9950X hit around 5710-5725MHz, marginally behind the 7950X (5750MHz).
Power Consumption
In heavy workloads like Blender, the 9950X consumed 223W, significantly lower than the 7950X (251W) but well above the 9700X (87.6W). This places it in a better power-efficiency bracket than the Intel 14900K, though it remains more power-hungry than the previous Ryzen generations.
Benchmark Results
Blender (Tile-Based Rendering)
The 9950X outperformed the 7950X by 12%, showing impressive gains, particularly for production workloads like 3D rendering. The 9950X also shaved off 43% of the render time compared to the older 5950X, making it a top choice for content creators.
Adobe Photoshop
The 9950X showed only a minor 7% improvement over the 7950X, with the 9700X and 9950X performing similarly. Adobe Photoshop doesn’t fully leverage the extra cores, so the performance uplift in this area was modest.
Adobe Premiere
In Premiere, the 9950X delivered a 31% performance boost over the 5950X, aligning itself closely with Intel’s 14900K in this area. The improvement from the 3950X was 42%, marking a significant generational leap.
Chromium Code Compile
The 9950X reduced compile time by 10% compared to the 7950X, completing the task in 66 minutes. This result firmly places the 9950X ahead of its predecessors and competitors in highly parallelized tasks.
7-Zip Compression and Decompression
The 9950X posted strong results in compression, delivering a 5.9% increase over the 7950X. However, its biggest win came in decompression, where it outpaced the 14900K by 22%, showing that workloads favoring multi-core setups greatly benefit from this chip.
Efficiency
While the 9950X excels in all-core workloads, its efficiency in less demanding tasks, like gaming, was underwhelming. In games like Final Fantasy XIV, the 9950X pulled 85W, which led to lower efficiency when compared to CPUs with fewer cores. Games simply don’t leverage the full potential of a 16-core CPU, making it less ideal for gamers prioritizing efficiency.
Conclusion
The AMD Ryzen 9 9950X is an impressive upgrade, particularly for professionals in content creation, 3D rendering, or software compilation. It shows strong generational improvements in power efficiency and multi-core performance. However, the core-parking requirement is something to be mindful of, as incorrect setup could lead to performance dips. For gamers, its high power draw and limited efficiency gains may push them toward other options, but for workstation use, the 9950X is a powerful, well-rounded choice.
The AMD Ryzen 9 9950X is up for review, and we’re diving into its performance against contenders like the Ryzen 9 7950X, R7 9700X, and Intel's 14900K. What sets the 9950X apart is its architecture, built on Zen 5, and its unique requirement for core parking, a system that optimizes CPU core usage for certain tasks.
Pricing and Alternatives
AMD Ryzen 9 9950X: 68k to 79k
Buy from Amazon - https://amzn.to/3XiElWu
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X: ₹53k to ₹77k
Buy from Amazon - https://amzn.to/3ziZCHK
AMD Threadripper 7960X: Upto ₹149k
Buy from Amazon - https://amzn.to/3XoWcez
Intel Core i9-14900K: 54k to 68k
Buy from Amazon - https://amzn.to/3XnyHT1
AMD Ryzen 9 7900X: up to 37k to 62k
Buy from Amazon - https://amzn.to/4cZB701
Core Parking Setup
Before getting into the benchmarks, it's crucial to understand how core parking works for the 9950X. This feature is now necessary for the 9950X and the upcoming 9900X. Core parking is designed to manage how cores are allocated across workloads, especially when the CPU has multiple chiplets (CCD). Without this setup, performance can be affected by double-digit percentages.
New CPU's like the 9950X and 9900X require core parking for optimal performance. Here’s a quick setup guide:
Install AMD Chipset Drivers: Ensure you have the latest chipset drivers.
Update Windows: Enable Game Mode and update the Game Bar.
Configure Power Settings: Use the Balanced power plan(Control Panel > Power Options) or After rebooting, run start /wait Rundll32.exe advapi32.dll,ProcessIdleTasks in Command Prompt to finalize settings.
Verify Configuration: Use powercfg.exe /queryprofile scheme_current profile_gamemode CPMinCores to ensure core parking is active.
Skipping this process could significantly hamper performance in both gaming and productivity tasks.
Frequency Performance
All-Core Frequency: The 9950X reached an average of 5000MHz under full load, slightly underperforming the 7950X’s 5100MHz. However, the 9950X outpaces the 9700X (4500MHz) in most tests.
Single-Core Frequency: In Cinebench single-threaded tests, the 9950X hit around 5710-5725MHz, marginally behind the 7950X (5750MHz).
Power Consumption
In heavy workloads like Blender, the 9950X consumed 223W, significantly lower than the 7950X (251W) but well above the 9700X (87.6W). This places it in a better power-efficiency bracket than the Intel 14900K, though it remains more power-hungry than the previous Ryzen generations.
Benchmark Results
Blender (Tile-Based Rendering)
The 9950X outperformed the 7950X by 12%, showing impressive gains, particularly for production workloads like 3D rendering. The 9950X also shaved off 43% of the render time compared to the older 5950X, making it a top choice for content creators.
Adobe Photoshop
The 9950X showed only a minor 7% improvement over the 7950X, with the 9700X and 9950X performing similarly. Adobe Photoshop doesn’t fully leverage the extra cores, so the performance uplift in this area was modest.
Adobe Premiere
In Premiere, the 9950X delivered a 31% performance boost over the 5950X, aligning itself closely with Intel’s 14900K in this area. The improvement from the 3950X was 42%, marking a significant generational leap.
Chromium Code Compile
The 9950X reduced compile time by 10% compared to the 7950X, completing the task in 66 minutes. This result firmly places the 9950X ahead of its predecessors and competitors in highly parallelized tasks.
7-Zip Compression and Decompression
The 9950X posted strong results in compression, delivering a 5.9% increase over the 7950X. However, its biggest win came in decompression, where it outpaced the 14900K by 22%, showing that workloads favoring multi-core setups greatly benefit from this chip.
Efficiency
While the 9950X excels in all-core workloads, its efficiency in less demanding tasks, like gaming, was underwhelming. In games like Final Fantasy XIV, the 9950X pulled 85W, which led to lower efficiency when compared to CPUs with fewer cores. Games simply don’t leverage the full potential of a 16-core CPU, making it less ideal for gamers prioritizing efficiency.
Conclusion
The AMD Ryzen 9 9950X is an impressive upgrade, particularly for professionals in content creation, 3D rendering, or software compilation. It shows strong generational improvements in power efficiency and multi-core performance. However, the core-parking requirement is something to be mindful of, as incorrect setup could lead to performance dips. For gamers, its high power draw and limited efficiency gains may push them toward other options, but for workstation use, the 9950X is a powerful, well-rounded choice.
